TalentLab: Starts the 3rd Edition and re-opens the Exhibition at the Mandarina Space!

The 3rd Edition of the CSIC’s project, TalentLabstarts with a new series of workshops and interdisciplinary dialogues opened to the public (from March 5 to June 16, 2014).

And to launch this new edition, this Friday, February 28, at 19h at the Mandarina Space, we will be opening the Exhibition of the TalentLab Educative Resources.

 

This exhibition was first exhibited on October 2013, at the Residència d’Investigadors (CSIC- Generalitat de Catalunya). You will now be able to see all the educative resources created during the past TalentLab editions and get to know all about this 3rd Edition.

We invite you all to come by at the Mandarina Space to get to know more about TalentLab. It’s free and open to everyone, just need to register here.

 

 

This year’s edition of TalentLab will have two working lines:

Workshops for teachers with whom we will be working and exploring the resources created during the last editions. There will be 3 workshops (March 12, 19 and 26), each one dedicated to two of the topics explored on TalentLab I and II.

- A series of interdisciplinary dialogues between the public and researchers (March 5, April 7 and June 16) around some Nature-Technology controversial topics: Transgenics, Cyborgs and Fukushima.

These events will take place at the Residència d’Investigadors (CSIC- Generalitat de Catalunya), at 18h. These are free events with registration.

Check all the info at talentlab.csic.es

Share

2nd Edition TalentLab: 'Co-Creating a scientific exhibition with the public' workshop summary - 2nd Session

Session two – iteration and integration

The next day, participants came full of new ideas and materials to improve what they had started the day before. They had some time to work on their prototypes and then the iterations started. The interchange of ideas between people of the other groups promoted discussion and also constructive inputs for the proposals. At the same time, it was an opportunity to return to the group with new ideas for their own proposals.

Then, they defined their final projects. The first group summarized their ideas as ‘science expresses but humans interpret it and get emotionally affected’, which sought to identify the creative process as emotions, emotions which in turn change the creative process. It would have two areas, one ‘experimental or creative’ where real experiments (crystallization processes and microbiological cultures) would took place, and the other, a multimedia area with video screenings of the experiments and creations to provoke an emotional reaction in the visitors. This should be built by a team of experts (scientists, multimedia technicians, engineers and technical staff), always keeping in mind the pedagogical aspects of the exhibition. They estimated a total cost of 23.000€.

  

The second group summarized their proposal with the message ‘evolution has no direction and no limits’, highlighting the need to know the past to understand the future. They proposed to build a museum that included an exhibition area with an interactive timeline, and an area of interactive games where the topic ‘evolution of technology’ would be explored. To carry it out, a multidisciplinary team would be required (biologists, designers, journalists, director/manager, volunteers) and the total cost would be 500.000€.

The third group entitled their proposal ‘The Limits of Technology’, which aimed to make the visitor reflect on when should technology be stopped. It would be a virtual tour (holography, 3D, Wii) to explore three topics: health, food and energy. The idea would be to pose dilemmas about the relationship between Nature and Technology. Through the virtual tour, the visitors would be encouraged to reflect and make decisions about positive and negative aspects of each topic (moral, historical, hypothesis). The first part would show the historical facts and the second, the current and future dilemmas. To develop the proposal, again a multidisciplinary team would be needed: programmers, designers, journalists, communicators and scientists. On the basis of hiring 20 persons for six months with an average salary of 2.000€/month, the group calculated a budget of 240.000€.

The fourth group proposed a trip trough the ‘natural inspiration in the technological creation’, considering that nature is a source of inspiration to technology. They proposed a tour through an interactive tunnel with three areas: an ‘inspiration’ zone with visual and auditory stimuli (images and sounds from Nature), a ‘discovery’ zone where the visitor would be presented with examples in which nature was used as a template, and a ‘creation’ zone to generate new ideas in a participatory way. These ideas would be projected in a big screen and the visitor would also be able to continue sending suggestions from home. To carry out this proposal one would need a team made of scientists, designers, programmers, graphic designers, and explainers. They estimated a total cost of 200.000€, but with the possibility to adapt the proposal to a less expensive, but still interactive, format.

  

Finally, the fifth group suggested to explore ‘the two faces of technology’ in order to raise public awareness of the benefits and drawbacks of technological progress, and also that the accessibility to technology is a determinant parameter of human quality of life with a strong effect on the opportunities that one can have. They proposed to create a tablet game (or a cardboard one) in which the players would have to create pairs of opposites related with different technological advances, focusing on six key topics. Additionally, with open questions, the participants would be encouraged to share their opinions and ideas about these topics, and stimulate transformation and change. The group did not estimate how it would cost to produce this interactive module, but they underlined the fact that it would be adaptable to a wide range of budgets.

Once all the groups had presented their proposals, we challenged them with a last exercise where they had to integrate all or some of the proposals into a single one, by finding a link between them. The intention was to identify the similarities, complementarities or differences between them. From the different possibilities, the groups suggested to integrate the first and fourth proposals as they highlight the aesthetic and emotional aspects of the creative process. They also mentioned the possibility of merging the second, third and fifth proposals to explore the role of technology in our society in a more complex way: the different faces of technological evolution and the need to define its limits.

  

The workshop was a way to reflect on the complex relationship between technology and nature and their role of society. At the end of the session, it was clear that there are many ways to translate these topics into exhibitions, but it was also clear that there are an obvious interest by the public to participate in the creation of contents. From the proposals generated in this workshop, the idea is now to keep working and exploring the nature-technology duality, with the help of new collaborators, in order to translate the results into a real exhibition.

This activity was also a opportunity to explore some innovative working dynamics that favor participation and interdisciplinarity, but also an opportunity to establish new networks of contacts, or worknetting (first work together, then connect the opposite to the much abused “networking”), as Irene from La Mandarina de Newton said. We hope this workshop will be the beginning of a new line of work for CSIC (Catalonia), open to everyone.

You can find more photos in our facebook page.

For more information you can also check out the website of TalentLab.

—————–
Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC. 
Irene Lapuente. La Mandarina de Newton S.L.

Share

2nd Edition TalentLab: 'Co-Creating a scientific exhibition with the public' workshop summary - 1st Session

The fourth and last workshop of TalentLab II (21 and 22 of February, 2013) at the Residència d’Investigadors (CSIC Barcelona). With this workshop we began a new line of work, open to the public, with which we aimed to explore and define the guidelines for a future scientific exhibition inspired on the duality nature-technology. This time, the work process was developed in two sessions and the different groups of participants evolved throughout the two days. The participants were interchanging groups according to the dynamic of the sessions. Therefore, when we refer to a certain group, remember that they are not always formed by the same people.

Session one – inspiration and conception

The first session began with a reflection on the nature-technology duality. Frequently, when we think about ‘nature’ and ‘technology’ we immediately associate them to pre-conceived images or ideas, and we also see them as opposite terms. Is this true? Is it easy to define in crisp, clear terms what is ‘natural’ and what is ‘artificial’? If this is not the case, why are we constantly opposing one against the other? After being prompted with these kind of questions to spark a debate, the participants divided themselves in groups. Getting inspiration from printed images. they discussed about the boundaries between nature and technology.

From these provoking exercise, the first group, inspired by a picture of huge tree roots encroaching the ruins in Angkor Vat (Cambodia), emphasized the idea that ‘in the end nature always imposes itself’. They also mentioned that nature offers us technology that can be mimicked by humans (picture of a beehive). They referred to ship transport as an example of globalization due to the technological advances, and the positive (cargo transport) and negative (transport of invasive species) aspects we all should evaluate. In this sense, they also commented on the role of technology in improving life’s quality, in contrast to its use for war.

The second group mentioned nature as an inspiration to develop sustainable technology. From a picture of a earthquake they raised the idea of ‘re-thinking’ technology from the observation of nature.

co-crear 014    co-crear 013 

The third group remarked that, although globalization have enabled the access to more resources (goods), we have to be careful about the over-exploitation of nature. As an example of the contradictions of the globalized world (and at the same time, of the hybridization of nature and technology) they mentioned the fact that some fruits and vegetables that reach our supermarkets may have been collected more than a year ago and they just maintain their aspect due to anoxic treatments. The group also highlighted that technology should be seen as an ally.

The fourth group said that ‘we are technology’. From an image of a stone, they emphasized that nature is not a static thing, it is in constant change. Contrary to what the first group highlighted, they argued that nature does not have to impose itself, simply because there is no confrontation. They remarked the idea that technological knowledge has no control over everything, over nature, although it is a widespread idea. They also mentioned the need for ‘coexistence’. A picture of a Eduardo Kac’s installation where two girls look at a live microcosmos, suggested to them ‘curiosity’ and ‘control of nature’.

Finally, the fifth group, inspired by the order in a container ship and the disorder of a landfill site, highlighted the opposite ideas of order and chaos. From another image which depicted the use of DDT in the past, the group reinforced the idea that one cannot predict the consequences of the use of technology, reinforcing the point of view of the fourth group, i.e., that one cannot have control over everything. Finally, they also mentioned the topic of patents. They questioned if it is right to consider nature as an ‘invention’ and therefore, to grant exploitation rights to the companies so that they can manage natural resources, such as water.

From all these ideas, participants then wrote down in post-its the ideas they considered most relevant and hung them on panels. The next step was to, altogether, reorganize the ideas into topic groups. The participants ended up with six groups: inclusion-exclusion of technological knowledge, food, limits, evolution, natural models, and creation and emotion. Then, each participant chose one of these topics and from this self-selection, new working groups were created. In order to maintain five groups, the topic ‘food’ was incorporated in the ‘inclusion-exclusion’ one.

In order to start narrowing these general ideas, we used a creative method called ‘brainwriting’, in which everyone works for everyone. First, each participant wrote down three specific actions for each of the topics, in a complete and concise sentence. The worksheets were passed through all the members of each group and this activity generated 250 proposals. Then, individually, everyone voted the ones they found more interesting. For the topic ‘Natural Models’, participants highlighted the proposal of displaying tools and materials inspired by natural morphologies, Gaudi’s art style, natural architecture found in flowers, and industrial products inspired by nature.

For the topic ‘Inclusion-Exclusion of Technology’, participants voted for a proposal which consisted in exhibiting photographies that bring to light this contrast or, alternatively, images that are not what they look like; they also voted for a world map to show where the different technologies are created and where they are used, and also proposed an activity to discuss the topic of the exclusivity of the patents regarding nature and food industry.

For the topic ‘Creation and Emotion’ they chose an activity that would put the visitor in the place of a person with sensory disorders: a fear module where the human reaction to different problems would be put to test, a role-playing game to explore how it would be to live without technology (in order to realize that actually we are surrounded by technology), a soundtrack inspired by nature, the reuse of obsolete technology.

 

For the topic ‘Evolution’ they voted for a representation of the brain in which the different parts would be illuminated to show how evolution took place throughout species, a showcase with the different tools that humans used through evolution, a representation of the mass production of food, to show how objects evolved (feather pen to ball pens, rock to high-tech tablets). Also they proposed to exhibit photographs of the same place throughout the years, and to show one object/invention and how it evolved through the years and in different ethnicities.

For the topic ‘Limits’, the participants chose a proposal to bring the attention of the public towards the ethic problems related with biotechnology, an interactive game to highlight the limits (ethical, technological, etc.) of different topics, a representation of a brain of an elderly person as a symbol of our limits, and an activity to discuss about the exportation of waste by showing a mountain of waste as a way to represent human consumption.

 

From these ideas, the groups had to define and work on a specific proposal. They had some time to clarify ideas and narrow the options. Finally, late in the afternoon, we saw the first 3D prototypes.

You can find more photos in our facebook page.

For more information you can also check out the website of TalentLab.

—————–
Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC. 
Irene Lapuente. La Mandarina de Newton S.L.

Share

2nd Edition TalentLab: 'Near the Ocean' - workshop summary

The third TalentLab workshop, ‘Near the Ocean’, took place last wednesday (February 6, 2013) at the Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Barcelona. This workshop was dedicated to the marine ecosystem, focusing on the impact that humans and technology have on it. The session began with a visit to the aquarium facilities of the Institut. Josep Maria Gili showed us how the different marine organisms, like polyps, jellyfish, ctenophores, are maintained. He explained the difficulties in cultivating these species and the need to tightly control a vast number of parameters (light, temperature, water flows, etc.) in order to reliably mimic their natural habitat. This way, researchers are able to study them ‘in situ’ and obtain some specific data, as the growth rate, that otherwise would be impossible to get.

After this interestingly ‘guided tour’, we went back to the workroom and started the workshop itself. The participants divided into five groups and Irene Lapuente (La Mandarina de Newton) explained how the session was going to be lead. The first task was to discuss within each group the images and objects that the participants had brought. In this warm-up activity, the first group highlighted the duality of some topics: the marine monitoring systems – which importantly allow the surveillance of the ecosystems, but do not take into account the need to, at the same time, create awareness; the oil containment booms – extremely useful to minimize the consequences of oil spills, but also a huge visual impact; the cotton swabs – which are of daily use, but are also ‘destruction weapons’ for some marine animals; biodiversity vs. artificial diversity.

taller 3 010 inspiracio totxana

The second group focused on three topics: climate change and the need to be scientifically rigorous when one promotes science; what people enjoy from a day on the beach (explore it, conserve it and memories), and what they don’t (overcrowding or bad smells); and the technology as a tool to reveal the seascapes, otherwise unreachable. The third group, inspired by the concept of the shark as a predator symbol, highlighted the impact of overfishing and pollution in the marine ecosystem which, by bioaccumulation, ends up affecting also the human population. The group also mentioned the impact of the huge floating garbage island and the lack of actions to reduce it. The fourth group focused on the waste, but also on the ‘artificialisation’ of the marine ecosystem: both the creation of new ecosystems, like the human-made coral reefs, and the ‘artificialisation’ of the shores. These concepts led to the topics of functionality and infrastructures, maximum sustainability, and the duality economy vs. ecology. The fifth group mentioned the need to recover some unfairly forgotten knowledge; the need to consider the past to understand the present and face the future. They also discussed the idea of discovering what the sea hides, as a way to reveal what has been done to it.

taller 3 005 inspiracio tauro

From these starting ideas, the groups then identified the target public of their educational resources. Generally, they all chose a cheerful, curious, outgoing student, with multiple interests (music, sports, friends), with few changes in his/her life, and with some family problems. Some of the groups also considered the multiculturalism of our society and the consequences of technologies in the creation of new ‘languages’ (emoticons).

taller 3 006 prioritats semafor

In order to start defining the educational resources, the groups set the priorities and the points to avoid of their proposals. The first group aimed to encourage debate, the active participation of the students, the interdisciplinary, time-restriction, and to avoid the clichés. The second group wanted to encourage the debate and experimentation, to promote physical activity, teamwork, and to avoid the stereotypes, excessive competition and the lack of rigor.

The third group stressed the need to be scientifically rigorous, stimulate curiosity, creativity and teamwork, and that it should be visually appealing, avoiding it from being too technical and theoretical. The fourth group highlighted again the need to generate debate and stimulate thinking, to be fun and visual appealing, and to avoid the typical science exhibition narrative contents. Finally, the fifth group prioritized the need to stimulate curiosity, generate questions and interaction, and to refrain the exclusive use of new technologies.

taller 3 007 proposta 2

After a short break, each group started to give form to their proposals. In this step of the process, the groups had the opportunity to exchange ideas and receive the feedback from all the participants. The final resource proposal of the first group was a mobile application for the users to evaluate the condition of the beaches (services, sport facilities, preservation state). The data generated would be, at the same time, useful for the participants and for the scientific community, as they could extract it for statistical analyses. The second group proposed a collection of ‘Ocean Games’. An adaptation of traditional games to the marine ecosystems’ topic: the ‘scarf game’ with fish names instead of numbers; the ‘Guess Who’ game to identify different marine species; the ‘Who eats Who’ to promote physical activity; and the ‘Memory’ game to pair the species with some of their characteristics. These activities could be offered as a gymkhana during the cultural week, or within the program of school activities.

taller 3 014 proposta 1

The third group devised their resource as a garbage collecting activity from the beaches and its posterior analysis. The effects of waste and chemical contaminants on marine ecosystems would then be discussed in the classroom.

The fourth group proposed a game aiming to reflect on the economic and ecological questions of fishery activity. It would be a team exercise and each group would have its own fleet of boats. Using a mobile application, the groups would ‘go’ on a fishing trip during one week. After this period, the different scenarios created for each trip would be compared and discussed.

taller 3 012 proposta 5

Finally, the proposal of the fifth group was a ‘fishing blog’ to explore in the classroom the present and past of fishery activity. To start, students would have access to related contents and images and from here, they would identify a subject of interest: type of boats, type of fishes, how the fish is sold, the fisherman lifestyle, or the type of fishing tackles. The students would then divide into groups that would have to collect information about the chosen topic. It would be an online resource to promote the use of offline resources: archives, museums, libraries, markets, interviews. Then, the findings would be presented and discussed in the classroom in order to investigate how fishery has changed over the years. A summary of the activity would be uploaded to the blog and there would be the possibility of online feedback. This proposal was the one selected by the workshop participants as the ‘wining’ educational resource of this session.

This workshop extended a bit more than expected: it was almost dinner time when we finished. This was the last TalentLab activity (of this year) exclusively dedicated to teachers and researchers, since the next one will be also opened to the general public. Now, it is time to start working on the three selected educational resources of this second edition of TalentLab.

You can find more photos in our Facebook page.

For more information you can also check out the website of TalentLab.

—————–
Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC. 
Irene Lapuente. La Mandarina de Newton S.L.

Share

2nd Edition TalentLab: 'Technology in Space' - workshop summary

The second workshop of TalentLab, ‘Technology in Space’, took place last wednesday (January 30, 2013) at the Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya. Before starting the session, one of the participants, Francesc Vilardell, explained us that it is possible to control in real time the telescope of the Observatory of Montsec (Catalonia, Spain). This is a very nice tool that allows any institution to request and reserve the telescope to use for their own projects. He also explained that other observatories in Spain also have a dedicated service to schools that allow their students to observe (live) the planets and stars.

After this brief introduction, Irene Lapuente (La Mandarina de Newton) and Laura Valls (CSIC) explained how the session was going to be lead and the participants divided themselves into three heterogeneous groups of teachers and researchers. The dynamics of the session was similar to the previous workshop. First, the groups discussed and exchanged ideas taking images related with space and technology as a starting-point. The aim of this activity was to begin creating a map of ideas, a first draft of what would become the final proposal of each group.

Interestingly, there was a common topic to all the three groups: space exploration and the management of the waste generated.The first group proposed the creation of a sort of starter kit to explore space. It would be a team project in which students would have to identify what one needs for a space trip to explore other planets, and it would request the knowledge from different disciplines (history, biology, technology, …).The second group highlighted the problem generated by the permanent use of fake or manipulated images to address astronomy/space topics. This makes it difficult for both adults and students to have a realistic perception of what space is in fact. They also stressed the need to end with the egocentric view that many of us still have: ‘There’s a whole universe apart from the Planet Earth!’.The third group proposed an activity with the goal of launching a satellite into space. It would be a work group developed at different levels and in which the students would have to make a presentation of the final project.

The next task was the identification of the ‘target’ students and their interests. Each group had also to identify the key points of their educative resource and the ones to avoid. From here, the participants began to define the details of their proposals and to build the final scheme or prototype.

Although in this session the groups started with similar topics, the proposed formats were quite different. The first group presented an application of a space trip, designed for mobile devices. Students (12-13 years) would have to upload information and images to the platform and this would make them possible to go through the different levels of the trip.

 

The second group presented their proposal as a web / blog. Students (high school) would have to lead a project to send a satellite into orbit. It would be a team work in which students would specialize in the different tasks necessary to launch the satellite. The webpage would have links to other websites of reference (NASA, ESA, etc.) and include, for example, an area with questions and a self-assessment.

The third group presented an alternative format: a sort of board game of the goose, with an additional digital Scratch version. In this case the aim for the students would be to launch a rocket to Mars and they would have to create themselves the pieces of the game.

At the end we had to choose one of the three proposals created. In this session, participants surprised us and suggested a change in the voting format. They decided that the final vote would be taken by us, ‘the organizers’. And thus, for the quality of the content and the appealing format, we chose the project of the first group. From here, we will now analyze the economic feasibility of the educative resource and also the possibility of adapting the proposal by integrating ideas from the two other projects.

You can find more photos in our Facebook page.

For more information you can also check out the website of TalentLab.

—————–
Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC. 
Irene Lapuente. La Mandarina de Newton S.L.

Share

2nd Edition TalentLab: 'Technologies from the Past' - workshop summary

On wednesday (January 23, 2013) we started the second edition of TalentLab with the workshop ‘Technologies of the Past’ that took place at the Residencia de Investigadores (CSIC-Generalitat de Catalunya). The session had an intensive work program. It began with a visit to the facilities of the Department of Archaeology of the Institución Milá y Fontanals (CSIC), where the in-house scientists had the opportunity to explain their research projects: from the study of organic and stone tools’ production and their georeferencing in collections, to the ethnographic and archaeological analysis of the constructions of the past, including paleobotanical and climate studies.

After the visit, we returned to the Residencia de Investigadores where the workshop activities, guided by Irene Lapuente from La Mandarina de Newton, took place. After a brief introduction to the project and to the structure of the session, the participants divided themselves into three working groups.

The materials (objects and images) that participants had previously selected were the starting-point for the first activity: a ‘warm-up’ to bring out ideas and start discussion within the groups.

The first group highlighted the still entrenched sexist image of prehistory, especially in the textbooks, and also the positive and negative dual side of technology that depends for what it is used for. The second group emphasized the role of technological production in the process of socialization and the emergence of humanity. Finally, the third group brought out the topic of the stereotyped archaeologists seeking treasures, which show up in movies (Indiana Jones, Lara Croft) and that blur the real motivation of an archaeologist: the interest in understanding how societies lived in the past. They also emphasized the need to be aware that archeological heritage belongs to everyone.

From these presentations came out an interesting discussion on the role that movies and TV have in developing people’s vocations. Participants agreed that this distortion of reality by the media could lead to frustration of the young teenagers that decide to venture into archeology.

Then the discussion move on to the importance of bringing students closer to real research and to promote their spirit of inquiry rather than simply transmitting knowledge. For the participants it was clear the need of reminding students, and society in general, that there is still much to learn. Then, the participants focused on the target audience of their educational resource project. From information gathered from interviews with real students, the groups had to identify their main interests and concerns and from here re-think their initial projects. Participants defined th priorities of their resources: the need for reflection and the need to move away from hackneyed subjects and, in contrast, to transmit veracity. Also which topics to avoid: the sexist vision of the past and the presentation of scientific facts as if everything was already known.

After a short break, the groups had to define the format of their educational resources and build a prototype or a scheme.

The first group thought of an activity in which, from object and tools images, the students had to identify and reconstruct the context from which they would have been extracted. These exercise would generate collective reflection about the objects, but also it would be a way to figure out what has been already discovered and what is still a scientific question.

The second group devised a board game, Evolupoly, as an assessment or synthesis activity. It would have the prehistoric eras represented on a concentric timeline and would end with the appearance of the first scriptures (in the centre of the board). The circles would be divided into boxes, each one corresponding to a series of questions that would test the knowledge of the students.

Finally, the third group proposed an educational resource with which the students, from images of ceramic objects, would build replicas and explore and deduce what they were used for. At the same time, this hands-on activity would be supported with information about the origins of the object and its historical context.

In the end, the participants voted for the best of the proposed educational resources. They chose this last project. After an open discussion about all the proposals that had been presented, we considered the possibility of incorporating ideas from the other resources into the winning one. Now, we must work on this educational resource with the collaboration of everyone!

You can find more photos in our Facebook page.

For more information you can also check out the website of TalentLab.

—————–
Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC. 
Irene Lapuente. La Mandarina de Newton S.L.

Share

TalentLab: Among intelligent machines – session I

Last Wednesday we conducted the first session of the workshop “Among intelligent machines,” in the Research Institute in Artificial Intelligence IIIA (CSIC). This was part of the TalentLab project.

An intensive work program was scheduled for that day, starting with a site visit guided by David Sierra. His explanations helped to introduce ourselves to the different research lines undertaken at the institute, including a demonstration of dog-like robotic football players to explain how they manage machine learning.

After entering the work room, participants were divided into three groups and we began the session itself. In the inspiration stage, common ideas emerged within each group, although with different approaches. The first group  suggested the idea that “everything is connected,” and proposed a kind vision about technology, based on thought and physical reality (people, nature), combined with the use of the network and the “cloud”. This framework of connections could collapse under pressure of cutbacks. The second group drew some “axes” to be positioned between the “information chaos” of the network and the abstract order, on the one hand, and the boundaries between utopia (thought) and reality, on the other. These axes guide the use of technologies by people in everyday life and decision making. The third group showed the role of people in the “choice of the future” desired, taking into consideration knowledge, people and their own needs. They placed the dichotomy between two realities according to the role of technology: one supporting autonomy, responsibility and sustainability and another that creates dependency, is unsustainable and wants to control.

Then, the three groups proceeded to imagine the newsworthy events of an 8th March 2025. The predominance of digital format and new ways of communication were highlighted, while the shortcomings of infrastructure to bring connectivity to schools and the problem of energy resources were evidenced, as well as the possibility to have cars autonomously driven or the incorporation of robots in real life. There were also some coincidences in imagining a return to the pesseta (old currency). Regarding user profiles, was deeply discussed the idea of curiosity among young people, despite their lack of perseverance in completing tasks. Music, sports and technology were highlighted as main interests of this target group deeply based on friendship and social relations. Other comments pointed to their ability of not being always faithful to the truth or trying to invent excuses somehow suspicious.

Considering the ideas, concepts and debates hold during the three previous exercises, participants in each group did a quick brainwriting about educational resources that could allow teachers to work with technology and artificial intelligence in the classroom. Among all the proposals, the first group showed a preference for generating a networked resource that would promote an individual game to work with ecology and/or musical issues. They envisioned the possibility of linking this resource with robots or virtual reality, make it fun and, if possible, multi-platform. The second group proposed an online resource intended to promote collaboration for solving a current problem or challenge. Finally, the third group proposed work in a cross-resource that include patience as an ability to be learned.

In coming  days we will evolve ideas and we will continue with our work dynamics next session to help us define an unique educational resource.

—————–
Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC.
Irene Lapuente. La Mandarina de Newton S.L.

Share

TalentLab: Listening to the Earth - Session II

On February 15th we started the second session of the “Listening to the Earth” workshop, within the TalentLab project, with a visit to the centenary facilities of the Ebre Observatory (Observatori de l’Ebre de Roquetes). From the beginning the center was focused on the study of the relationships between the Sun and Earth, a pioneering research that, over time, has become increasingly important.

The visit focused on three main areas: the astronomical observatory, the meteorological station and the library. At the observatory we saw different telescopes used to observe the activity of the Sun and other less bright celestial bodies. At the weather station we saw different devices (traditional and modern) used to measure weather parameters. The Observatory owns a very homogeneous and stable data register (temperature, precipitation, humidity, etc.), which is highly relevant for climate studies. Finally, we accessed the library, specializing in Earth science, a pleasant place that over a century has accumulated more than one linear kilometer of publications. A centenary documentary essential for students of History of Science, where you can find technical books from the library of Narcís Monturiol.

After the visit, we went to a room to continue with the workshop in order to reach a specific proposal for an educational resource. We decided to join together in one group and to start working with our hands. But it took us a while: our engines were still cold!

Slowly, the first ideas arose: vegetation, facilities of the Observatory, videos, students, researchers, teachers, a wiki platform, a channel, weather stations, etc. From this point we began to mold the shape of the resource. It could be a wiki platform to work on the local climate combining the data collected with the observation of the vegetation. Students could try to find answers to the questions posed in a questionnaire and the results would be published on the platform with short videos easy to produce (MovieMaker). The idea is to offer an independent and interesting practice in itself, but could be complemented with a visit to the Ebro Observatory, thus adding value to the resource, comparing and discussing the data with professional researchers. The platform could also allow to compare data from different locations provided by different educational centers and, if done continuously, establish temporary records.

At this point, the proposal was contrasted with “future users”. They pointed the need for scheduled resources (files), that can be done in the classroom and in a cooperative way. Finally, the proposal was refined by introducing a wiki page for teachers and researchers where answer questions, include a protocol for making a rain gauge (if the school does not have one) and the possibility of comparing data between countries.

The group felt that the coordination between the Ebro Observatory and the CSIC Delegation is essential to go ahead with the project, both in preparing the contents and in managing the access to the wiki platform. The budget for this educational resource should not be too high. Finally, concluded that the title could be “My time and wether”. We could not ask for a more specific proposal.

—————–
Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC.
Irene Lapuente. La Mandarina de Newton S.L.

Share

TalentLab: Listening to the Eartch Session I

On January 25th we started the third TalentLab, workshop, “Listening to the Earth”. The place was the Ebre Observatory (Observatori de l’Ebre, CSIC-URL). As participants arrived they organized themselves into two groups, trying to find a balanced representation of backgrounds in each one. We introduced the workshop and the structure of the session, and we set ourselves to work.

First, to warm-up an spark inspiration, we put in common with all the groups the general context of climate change. We used images for that, ensued by a collection of the ideas that the images inspired to each participant. The first group emphasized the different scales (local, global) that we confront climate change and water problems. Also, they remarked the risks associated with water. It is a desirable and needed resource but it can also bring danger or disaster situations.

The second group suggested to visualize that the “path” to follow from one situation characterized by disasters (by natural or anthropic causes) to another, idealized, one where human action were harmonious with the natural environment, should go through the filter of scientific thought. This started a discussion with the first group. They thought that, nature (including big scale natural phenomena) had been harmonious before the human hand acted on it. We interpret that the “path” suggested by the second group wished to portray the ideal of a new rationality, a scientific thought that would act in a better accordance with the natural environment.

  

After this, we moved on to imagine future scenarios. Both groups focused on the local scale. The first one created a front page for the local newspaper (“La Veu de Roquetes”), for January 25th 2030. Headlines focused on water issues. Restrictions were damaging agriculture and the North-South water transfer had become obsolete. Energy also made headlines: they mentioned that oil was no longer the primary source of energy. They also reflected that life expectancy had reached 100 years.

The second group created a front page for the newspaper “Lo Sud”. The headlines emphasized the migratory movements originated by climate change (“Emergency world summit to solve a catastrophic situation: Norway reaches -30 Celsius and the Andalusia desert is offered as a relocation places for the displace Norweigan population”). They also mentioned the relevance of gene medicine to eradicate diabetes. The launching of a reusable space rocket was the last headline of “Lo Sud”.

After getting a view of the future, we moved on to imagine which type of user is hypothetically going to use the pedagogical contents resulting from Talentlab. Participants remarked user features related to general curiosity, as well as their interest in sports and culture. Also, a strong interest in using new communication technologies, specially Youtube. This started a short debate about the educational potential of this channel for science teaching. Different possibilities were mentioned. For example, its usefulness in showing scientific phenomena that are difficult to replicate in the classroom or, how to produce content for that channel. Also, how to get students into creating videos with experiences that they can upload to Youtube. In any case, it was clear that participants considered the channel as something to have into account.

In order summarize the ideas that emerged after these two activities, both groups created very comprehensive “paintings” that remarked the need to integrate natural and scientific aspects with social and economic considerations. The second group also depicted the need to introduce attitudes.

From this moment on, each group sketched an idea for an educative resource. The first group suggested the creation of a platform (wiki, blog, video, etc.) to work on the local effects of climate change. It should integrate scientific information (Physics, Biology, Chemistry, etc.). The second group suggested an “in situ” visit of the places and situations that users wished to get to know. Also, they also suggested graphic representations as a possible means of integrating knowledge and learning. For example, by using infographics, videos and other visual content.There are many things to be defined still. Nevertheless, it seems that there was a certain convergence towards the integration of different types of knowledge, to focus on local realities and the use of visual means. Let’s see what happens in the next meetings and how the initial proposal evolve.

—————–

Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC
Irene Lapuente. Co-Creating Cultures/La Mandarina de Newton SL 
Ramon Sangüesa. Co-Creating Cultures/La Mandarina de Newton SL
Share

TalentLab: React with the environment session II

On November 30th, we performed the second session of the ”React with the environment” workshop, at the Institute for Environmental Diagnostics and Water Research (CSIC). This time, all the participants sat around a table to share the highlights of the proposals that were presented in the previous session in order to design a unique proposal.

The need to create a resource that encouraged students to perform some type of research was highly mentioned. On the other hand, it was also stresses the need to look for subjects that students could find interesting and relate to everyday life. It was also spotted that this research had to be performed in small groups and it had to be independent of the research center. However, it was said that the educational resource could be adapted so the most interested students could extend their knowledge on the topics through a more extensive research project.

We discussed the topics that could be the source of these first level research projects. We chose three main areas: pollution, health and nutrition. Therefore, it was proposed to develop three research projects to address some environmental contaminants such as mercury, the trialometans and TBT (tributyl tin), and its effects on living organisms. The first two projects were thought for students at high school level and the third project was thought for students who are at 4th ESO grade. There would be the option to make some adjustments to adapt the projects to the Science for the Contemporary World school subject.

It raised the idea of ​​collecting information on the diet of the students in a class and relate it to the presence of organic forms of mercury in their hair, in order to work on the analysis of the accumulation of mercury in the food chain. To make this analysis we need to use some laboratory technique at the IDAEA. A few students and a teacher could go to the research center to visualise the process and then share it with the rest of the class. The second projet would consist in a collection of real data on the trialometans presence in chlorinated water (eg swimming pools) that CSIC could provide to students. Finally, the third proposal consisted on studying the TBT compound (used in paints for boats to avoid algae and other organisms) through the IMPOSEX effect in a kind of a marine snail. From the observation of many samples obtained in markets, students could study the phenomenon of masculinization of these snails.

It was suggested that the three research practices had an area of ​​documentation, a protocol of the test to be performed and/or some data to be analysed. We also talked about the possibility of students publicating their results. In addition, the educational resource could combine these three research practices with short videos and some visits to the research center. The researchers suggested that visits to the center could be concentrated twice a year during the first and the second term.

Now, we will continue working on the adaptation of these three educational proposals, which already have a high degree of precision, into a digital educational resource.

—————–

Laura Valls. Unitat de Cultura Científica Delegació del CSIC.
Irene Lapuente. La Mandarina de Newton S.L.

Photo credits: Luís Echanove
Share

Looking around the world

Training

Publications

Press clipping

Working Groups

 

@CoCreatingCult Tweets

Follow @CoCreatingCult on twitter.